Quotes

"It is every man's obligation to put back into the world at least the equivalent of what he takes out of it."

- Albert Einstein



Monday, July 8, 2013

The Riverine Rabbit - Bunolagus monticularis

Hi guys

Here's that information on the Riverine Rabbit - enjoy :)

Andrea
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Riverine Rabbit - Bunolagus monticularis

There are many endangered species of animal and plant in South Africa, but none of the country’s mammals are as endangered as the riverine rabbit (Smithers & Apps 2000), also known as the “bushman hare”, “doekvoetjie” or “boshaas” (Collins 2001; ARKive 2007). The IUCN Red Data List classified the riverine rabbit as Critically Endangered in 2004 (ARKive 2007; IUCN 2011) due to a constantly decreasing population (IUCN 2011). Although there seem to be more individuals than previously thought (Stuart 2007), it cannot be denied that this is still a pressing issue.

Physical Description

The riverine rabbit is distinctive in appearance (see Appendix A, Figure 1). Usually grey-brown in colour, it stands at about 12cm tall (Butchart 2009) and has a “dark brown stripe down the side of the lower jaw extending to ear base” which is unique to the species (Stuart 2007) and a light-coloured ring around its eyes (ARKive 2007). Although it’s long ears may be deceiving, the rabbit can be distinguished from a hare by its uniformly brown tail, as those of hares tend to be black and white (Collins 2001). It also has long, thick fur (ARKive 2007; Butchart 2009).
 
Behaviour

Although little seems to be known about the riverine rabbit’s behaviour (Stuart 2007), what is known is imperative to understanding the reasons for its precarious future. They are solitary, nocturnal animals that lie during the day in shallow, dug-out burrows (called forms) amongst the shrubs of which its habitat consists (Smithers & Apps 2000; Collins 2001; ARKive 2007; Butchart 2009; IUCN 2011). They feed on the leaves of shrubs and fresh grasses (Smithers & Apps 2000; Collins 2001; ARKive 2007; Stuart 2007; Butchart 2009). They also practice coprophagia – the eating of droppings – in order to gain necessary vitamins and digestive bacteria as efficiently as possible (Collins 2001; ARKive 2007). Reproductively, the riverine rabbit is not as productive as most rabbits – they only produce one litter of one to two young a year (Smithers & Apps 2000; Collins 2001; ARKive 2007; Stuart 2007; IUCN 2011). These are born into fur-lined forms (Smithers & Apps 2000; ARKive 2007; Stuart 2007). Natural predators include cats and genets (Butchart 2009).

Distribution

Bunolagus monticularis has a very limited distribution (see Appendix A, Figure 2). Itexists only in the Karoo region of South Africa, to which it is endemic, i.e. it is found nowhere else in the world (ARKive 2007; Stuart 2007; Butchart 2009). Riverine rabbits exist in the habitat that their name suggests - it is only found in the riverine vegetation along seasonal rivers in dry areas (Smithers & Apps 2000; Collins 2001; ARKive 2007; Stuart 2007; Butchart 2009; IUCN 2011). These areas consist of low, dense, moist and succulent scrubland and grasses (IUCN 2011).
 
Statistical Data

IUCN (2011) states that “the current population is estimated at less than 250 breeding pairs and is declining”, and that “there has been a rapid decline of population due to loss of 50-60% of habitat in the past 70 years”. There seem to be no more than 50 individuals in each subpopulation (individuals living in close proximity to one another). The historical habitat has been estimated to have decreased by 51-81% in the last 100 years, and the current habitat is predicted to decline by about 20% in the next century. (IUCN 2011)
 
Why is it endangered?

The decline in population numbers can be linked to an increase in agricultural activity (Smithers & Apps 2000; Collins 2001; ARKive 2007; Stuart 2007; Butchart 2009; IUCN 2011). Cultivation and livestock farming gives rise to extensive ploughing that destroys the rabbit’s habitat (Smithers & Apps 2000; Collins 2001; ARKive 2007; IUCN 2011), overgrazing that causes erosion, depleting food sources and cover to hide from predators (Collins 2001; ARKive 2007), fencing that restricts movement and scatters individuals (IUCN 2011). Agriculture and erosion means that individual rabbits are becoming more scattered (IUCN 2011), and a scattered population means less breeding opportunities. The riverine rabbit is also area-specific (which means that it is less likely to survive in other, more generalised areas), and is therefore more sensitive to disturbance.

An increase in farming activity also gives rise to an increase in domestic animals. This puts added predatory pressure on the rabbit population (Smithers & Apps 2000) - like all rabbits, the young are altricial, meaning that they are born blind and helpless (ARKive 2007), and so are particularly vulnerable to predators, and only producing one young a year means that they are not very successful breeders. This makes them particularly sensitive to predator pressure, as they cannot quickly reproduce to replace lost young.  The rabbits are also hunted for sport, and frequently are caught in traps set by farmers for predators or pests (ARKive 2007; IUCN 2011).
 
Solutions

Attempts to breed the animals in captivity and re-introduce them into their natural habitat are being made (Collins 2001), but are largely unsuccessful (Smithers & Apps 2000). Collins (2001) suggest that “the only way to secure the long term survival of a species is to protect its natural habitat”. Farmers are frequently encouraged to declare areas of their land Natural Heritage Sites or conservancies (Collins 2001) in order to save the habitat of the rabbits. Protection of said habitat also benefits the farmers in that the vegetation prevents run-off and loss of topsoil and ground water (Collins 2001). So far, three conservancies exist in the Karoo (ARKive 2007). The Endangered Wildlife Trust’s Riverine Rabbit Working Group was also created in 2003 “with the aim of establishing and conserving an ecosystem and socioeconomic conditions in the Karoo that can support a stable population of riverine rabbits” (ARKive 2007).

The riverine rabbit population is undoubtedly under threat, and solutions are being sought out. Initiatives like the above, as well as awareness projects, are imperative to the survival of the riverine rabbit, otherwise, as the IUCN (2011) has predicted, “the probability of extinction in the wild is more than 50% within the next 100 years” for the already critically endangered mammal.

 
References
 
 
  ARKIVE. 2007. Riverine rabbit (Bunolagus monticularis). http://www.arkive.org/riverine-rabbit/bunolagus-monticularis/#text=All

BUTCHART, D. 2009. Wildlife of Southern Africa: A Photographic Guide. Struik Nature, Cape Town.

COLLINS, J. 2001. Riverine Rabbit. http://www.bcb.uwc.ac.za/envfacts/facts/riverine.htm

IUCN. 2011. Bunolagus monticularis. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/3326/0

SMITHERS, R.H.N. & APPS, P. 2000. Smithers’ Mammals of Southern Africa: A Field Guide. Struik Publishers, Cape Town.
 
STUART, C. & STUART, T. 2007. Field Guide to Mammals of Southern Africa. Struik Nature, Cape Town.



 

Watch this space.

Hey.

I've actually remembered to post again - yay!

Second year has been super-hectic so far, and it is virtually impossible to explain exactly what all has happened in the few months since my last post without leaving any important bits out. So instead of giving you all long and tedious updates, I've decided instead to share some essays and reports I've written over the last year and a half that may shed some informative light into conservation matters and/or the things we study. Hope it'll be interesting..?

Next post to follow: information on the critically endangered riverine rabbit :)

Happy reading,
Andrea

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Uh, hello again..

Ahem.

So, it's been a couple of years (okay, one year and four months) since my last post. Pathetic, I know. I apologize.

A lot can happen in sixteen months. For example: I graduated from Damelin with a Certificate in Advanced Game Ranging and Lodge Management in February 2012, and applied to and have subsequently completed my first year of a National Diploma in Nature Conservation at Cape Peninsula University of Technology. Plus a lot of other stuff that's not really relevant. Needless to say, I forgot about the "Makuleke Story" post I was supposed to write. Again, I apologize.

Since my memory of the Back-up Trails Guiding course is not particularly fresh, I'm not sure I trust myself to write a post describing the experience, so I will just skip ahead to a brief recap of the last year:

After a relatively smooth late application (smooth when compared to Damelin's "super-efficient-but-not-really" administrative processing), I applied to CPUT's ND: Nature Conservation course. Best decision ever. In one year, I have learned a great deal more than I could have hoped. First Year subjects include Animal Studies, Plant Studies, Conservation Ecology, Resource Management, Conservation Communication and Conservation Development. The amount of work and depth these subjects cover is both daunting and refreshing, and I honestly can't wait to start Second Year in February. The Diploma course is three years (Third Year is a practical year at a reserve/protected area). Due to my interest in research, I am planning on completing a Bachelors of Technology in Nature Conservation (BTech) and then a Masters (MTech). Long way to go, but I'm amped.

Soooo, that's all I can muster for now. I shall be writing soon, hopefully. Volunteering at Princess Vlei until tech starts, so there will definitely be writing material over the next couple of weeks :)

Cheers for now,
Andrea



Thursday, September 29, 2011

Woah! It's been way too long..

Hey guys

Sorry for not posting in such a long time! [Insert excuse here.] Since my last post, I've had my fair share of assignments, activities, tests and exams, and lazy days.

Anyway, I plan to make up for the lack of posts in theses next few weeks, by putting together an epic account entitled "The Makuleke Story". I have recently spent five weeks in the awesomeness that is the Kruger National Park, four of which consisted of many hours of walking and learning on a Back-up Trails Guiding course in the Makuleke Concession. Be prepared for a lengthy read :P

Look forward to the next post!
..Andy

P.S. Please note that my computer has had to be restored, so some of the pictures posted before this month may have disappeared. Cool.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

International Whaling - An Environmental Law Assignment

Hey guys

So here's that assignment I did on international whaling. It's not as extensive as I'd like it to be, but I suppose that that's what happens when you rush things :P

Anyways, I hope you find it interesting,
Andy..
--------------------------------------------------------------------


International Whaling
An Environmental Law Assignment


Introduction


Whaling is the hunting and killing of whales for consumption, trade or industry. There are two types of whaling: traditional and commercial. Traditional whaling has been in practice for millennia, and is the hunting and killing of whales in order to sustain traditional and cultural customs. Commercial whaling is the hunting and killing of whales for economical reasons, such as trade.

There has been much controversy around the subject of whaling, especially in the last century. There are many more people against whaling than for it. The main points brought up by anti-whaling groups are that:
- whaling is endangering whale species
- the method of killing (exploding harpoons) is inhumane and the whales do not die immediately
- whaling targets whales that are curious enough to come close to boats, and these are the whales that are beneficial for ecotourism
- ecotourism such as whale watching brings in a larger income than whaling
- whales are as intelligent as humans (although this has not yet been scientifically proven)
- whaling destroys the social structure of the pod
- it is a matter of animal cruelty
- whaling is not a lucrative industry, and its products can be replaced

Although pro-whalers are outnumbered, they too have significant arguments. The main points brought up by pro-whalers are that:
- whale meat is organic
- the culling of whales means that there is more fish available for commercial fishing
- whaling can be sustainable
- whaling has never lead to the extinction of any whale species
- whaling is part of traditional culture in some nations
- whaling is no more cruel than the killing of pigs/sheep/cattle/fish
- whaling is the main source of income for many small communities
- arguments against whaling are subjective and based on emotions rather than practicality or sustainability

All of these points are valid to some extent, but the main problem with looking at the subject of whaling objectively is that whaling is very much a subjective issue, and so one needs to look at facts from both sides before making a decision. The arguments will be further explained and explored at a later stage.



History


Whaling has been a part of global history since before the Stone Age. The oldest record of whaling was found in South Korea – carved drawings of whaling with spears and boats have been dated back to 6000BC. The critical points in recorded whaling history are best read in a timeline:

9th Century - Norway, France and Spain begin whaling
10th Century - “Right whale” is most commonly targeted as it is easiest to kill; oil is used for lamps and baleen is used for whips, corsets, chairs, seats and fishing rods
- England, Denmark and several other nations begin whaling
12th Century - Japan starts using harpooning by hand
15-18th Century - Whaling in the Arctic
19th Century - some species are depleted due to high demand
- modern whaling techniques are developed
- discovery of petroleum leads to a replacement of whale oil for lamps
1848 - exploding harpoons are invented, now enabling the hunting of rorqual whales
1925 - the development of factory ships initiates massive industry growth
- the use of electricity for light eliminates the need for whale oil
1930 - 80% of great whale species are nearing extinction
- Germany and Japan join Britain and Norway in the Antarctic
1946 - International Whaling Commission (IWC) is set up by 15 nations in an effort to manage whale stocks
1963 - United Kingdom stops whaling
1969 - only Japan and Soviet Union are still whaling in the Antarctic
1972 - 6000 blue whale left
1979 - IWC establishes the Indian Ocean Whale Sanctuary
1982 - IWC bans commercial whaling (to start in 1986), but Japan, Norway and Iceland continue, as this does not ban traditional whaling
1986 - IWC ban comes into effect
- CITES lists the last species of great whale as critically endangered, leading to a ban in the trading of whale products
1987 - Japan begins “scientific whaling” programme
1990 - seven of the last nine whaling nations stop whaling
1993 - Norway objects to IWC ban
1994 - Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary established to protect breeding grounds
- Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (WDCS) releases survey results indicating that whale ecotourism is more profitable than commercial whaling
2000 - Norway and Japan attempt to remove the protected status of whales at a CITES meeting, but fail
2002 - Japan allegedly buys the votes of 14 nations at IWC meeting, leading to a rejection of the proposal to establish more whale sanctuaries
- Mexico protects 21 species of whale in its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the world’s largest sanctuary
2003 - Iceland starts “scientific whaling”
2005 - Norway and Japan increase whaling quotas
2006 - 17 nations state that Japan kills more whales in the Antarctic in one year than it did in total in its 31 years of scientific research
2007 - Iceland removes whaling quotas for 2008 due to lack of demand
- 88 countries belong to IWC



Arguments


The Argument Against Whaling

The biggest reason that so many people are against whaling is because they consider it an issue of animal cruelty. Whales are perceived to be the “gentle giants” of the sea, and are seemingly passive and as intelligent as humans (although this has not been proven). Because of this, people tend to think of them as free and innocent, and therefore undeserving of unnecessary killing after a life of freedom. The killing of individual whales is also believed to destroy the social structure of the whale pod. Whales live in complex family groups and rely on each other for survival, reproduction and companionship.

Whales are killed using exploding harpoons, which explode within the body of the whale and causing severe tissue damage. This method does not allow for immediate death and often another harpoon is needed to kill the animal. Many say that this prolonged death is inhumane and cruel.

The second largest argument is from a conservation perspective. Whaling targets many different species of whale, but there are a few species that are heavily hunted. Exact figures of whale populations are very difficult to determine as whales are hard to monitor and track, but a general trend has been observed – that in most cases, whaling has resulted in a decline in population numbers. The recent introduction of quotas has stabilised these numbers, however.

From an economic point of view, whale ecotourism such as whale watching has been proven to be more economically beneficial than the whaling industry. Whalers target whales that are easiest to kill, i.e. those that come closest to the boat. It is argued that the whales that are curious enough to come near boats are the ones that are most beneficial to the whale watching entities, and that the killing of said whales is detrimental to the ecotourism industry.

The last argument is that whaling is a small industry and that no country relies on whaling as its sole source of income, so if it were to stop, it would not be detrimental to any country’s economy. It is also believed that whale products can be substituted by other products. Whale meat is not as popular as meats such as beef or lamb.


The Argument in Favour of Whaling

The argument in favour of whaling, although less popular, is no less valid than that of the anti-whaling groups. The first counter-argument is that whaling for meat and by-products is no less cruel than the killing of animals such as cattle, sheep or pigs for meat and by-products. Pigs, too, are thought to be as intelligent as humans, yet there is less controversy around the subject. Another point is that whale meat is organic, and thus healthier than commercial meats that are pumped with hormones or bred in confined areas.

Pro-whalers are aware of the ecological situation that whaling creates, but believe that whaling can be sustainable by means of quotas and reasonable regulation. Some species, like the grey whale, are believed to have increased in population size despite whaling. There is also no record of any whale species having been driven to extinction because of whaling, although many have come close.

Whaling is also a critical part of the culture and tradition of some nations. Economically, whaling is the main source of income for many small island communities, and whalers in these communities are given a high status in these communities. Another argument is that the regulation of whale populations also regulates the amount of fish available for commercial fishing, which is a large contributor to the economies of many countries worldwide.

The last argument that whalers believe is very important is that arguments against whaling are extremely subjective and based on emotions, instead of the potential practicality or sustainability that whaling can provide.


International Laws Regulating Whaling

Customary international law states that the people of all nations are entitled to participate in whaling activity, unless the nation’s governing body has agreed otherwise. It also allows coastal countries or states to control whales within its national waters unless said nation is part of an international agreement that states otherwise. Nations also have sole authority over their citizens’ activities in international waters, meaning that no other authority can disallow whaling activity.

International Whaling Convention (IWC)
Established in 1946, the IWC was initially intended for the sole purpose of overseeing the management of the global whaling industry, i.e. to regulate the industry in order to recover whale populations. In 1986, it issued a ban on commercial whaling altogether.

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)
The CITES treaty protects endangered species from further depletion that may be caused by international trade, while promoting conservation. Great whale species were placed in CITES’s Appendix I in 1986 – a group for species threatened with extinction and which are negatively affected by trade. This prohibits all CITES members from trading in whale products.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
Members of the UNCLOS treaty are obligated to conserve marine mammals and follow the guidelines of the IWC. These duties are thought to have more weight than those of the IWC.



Conclusion


When one looks at the issue of whaling, one needs to be objective. It is easy to be swayed by emotional reasoning when it comes to environmental situations, especially those involving the killing of large animals, as we as humans easily become attached to animals to which we can relate behaviourally. One needs to look at facts in order to establish an informed opinion.

Firstly, whaling is an activity that has occurred historically. Many other things, such a monoculture, hunting and mining, have also occurred historically. With the benefit of time and technological advances, we are now able to see the impact of these activities on the environment and their possibilities as sustainable activities. We need to look at whaling in the same way – can it be practised sustainably, without detrimental impact to the environment as a whole?

Many small communities are reliant on whaling as a main source of food and trade. Whalers are of significant status in these communities, because they are able to hunt animals so much larger than themselves. This status provides a means of community structure, which would not be present if whaling were to cease. In addition, these communities only hunt between two to ten whales per year on average.

Large nations like Japan and Norway claim to whale as part of tradition, but process hundreds of whales per year and contribute heavily to the depletion of whale stocks. This is a concern for whale populations and needs to be regulated. Conservation is important in an age in which we are becoming increasingly aware of future implications.

With advancing technology and food products, whale products are less in demand than before, meaning that there is less whaling occurring today than historically, such as in the 18th and 19th Centuries. I believe that with carefully calculated regulations, whaling can be a sustainable industry. I don’t believe that whaling is an essential industry, nor that it is particularly more lucrative than other industries, particularly in more developed nations. I do feel, however, that it is essential to smaller, developing communities, both in economical and cultural sectors.

I do not believe that whaling should be stopped altogether. I would be happier if it were stopped, but I do not think that this would be beneficial in a global economic perspective. I do believe, however, that the industry needs to be regulated, just as the fishing, farming and mining industries need to be regulated, and without exception. Over-exploitation needs to be avoided and optimum ecological status needs to be sustained.

-------------------------------


References

http://content.www.rspca.org.uk/cmsprd/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application
%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobnocache=false&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1232992298757&ssbinary=true (PDF file)

http://www.whalecraft.net/History.html

http://www.ozpolitic.com/sustainability-party/why-allow-whaling.html

http://onlineessays.com/essays/issues/whaling-arguments.php

http://luna.pos.to/whale/gen_con_pro_whaling.html

http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/cbio/case.html

http://www.ecozine.co.uk/Whaling1.htm

http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Publications/iceland/wh-an-in.htm

http://www.animallaw.info/articles/ovuswhalelaws.htm

http://www.dickrussell.org/graywhale/conservation.html

http://weblog.greenpeace.org/whales/votes_chart_430.jpg

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Time for an update!

Allo, allo..

So, since my last post, I have met a whole lot of Cape Nature Conservation people, gone butterfly chasing, identified a moth, stabbed my hands with wire fencing, jumped a couple of fences, lured guinea fowl into a trap, been scared out of my wits by a porcupine named Pippa, scared a porcupine named Pippa out of her wits, scouted around for dragonflies and watched some birds eat lunch. Where have I been?

I've been volunteering at Rondevlei Nature Reserve.

Now, it might sound horribly exciting (which it may have been) but in just the three days that I helped out last week, I have started a butterfly and dragonfly species list, learned how to make a guinea fowl trap out of old fencing, learned how to set up and bait a guinea fowl trap, and updated my own bird list.

I'm hoping that by volunteering here, I will be able to gain a little experience in the field into which I am about to throw myself, and it's proven beneficial so far. I'm keen to do a little alien clearing, fencing, data capture and maybe even a little game capture. Plus, it feels good to help out my home town to conserve the diversity of its wetlands :)

In other news, I have just completed an assignment for Environmental Law on international whaling. Post to follow.

Ciao for now..
Andy

Friday, March 4, 2011

Just checking in..

Helloo :)

I hope you all found those articles as interesting as I did, and that you found the information at least a little bit useful (I know my mom has already read Captain Charles Moore's report to her Geography class).

Anyway, the last two weeks of college have been suprisingly interesting and informative. Game Reserve Management was interesting from the first paragraph, and Environmental Law is certainly not as tedious as I'd imagined. I suppose I still haven't exactly warmed to Entrepreneurship and Lodge Operations, but I think I'm getting there. I think I might just enjoy this year :)

Lastly, I suppose I should update the Frog of the Month, as it is now March. I'm going to try and make a point of keeping that spot exclusive to South African species, especially the lesser-known.

Until next time,
Andy